The Mind-numbing Effect of Liberal Bias

Cap'n Bill here: Aye Mateys! Me timbers shiver when me read the news--especially the New York Times, what they call "Opinion." That Frank Rich, whew! Scary what being so liberal can do to a person, man o man, even turn on their new leader who had the most liberal voting record of any senator. Why? Not gay friendly enough. No sirree, what right thinking, magnanimous and humble politician would allow a Pro Prop 8 person on the presidential platform:

Unlike Bush, Obama has been the vocal advocate of gay civil rights he claims to be. It is over the top to assert, as a gay writer at Time did, that the president-elect is “a very tolerant, very rational-sounding sort of bigot.” Much more to the point is the astute criticism leveled by the gay Democratic congressman Barney Frank, who, in dissenting from the Warren choice, said of Obama, “I think he overestimates his ability to get people to put aside fundamental differences.” That’s a polite way of describing the Obama cockiness. It will take more than the force of the new president’s personality and eloquence to turn our nation into the United States of America he and we all want it to be.
Obama may not only overestimate his ability to bridge some of our fundamental differences but also underestimate how persistent some of those differences are. The exhilaration of his decisive election victory and the deserved applause that has greeted his mostly glitch-free transition can’t entirely mask the tensions underneath. Before there is profound social change, there is always high anxiety.
The success of Proposition 8 in California was a serious shock to gay Americans and to all the rest of us who believe that all marriages should be equal under the law. The roles played by African-Americans (who voted 70 percent in favor of Proposition 8) and by white Mormons (who were accused of bankrolling the anti-same-sex-marriage campaign) only added to the morning-after recriminations. And that was in blue California. In Arkansas, voters went so far as to approve a measure forbidding gay couples to adopt.
There is comparable anger and fear on the right. David Brody, a political correspondent with the Christian Broadcasting Network, was flooded with e-mails from religious conservatives chastising Warren for accepting the invitation to the inaugural. They vilified Obama as “pro-death” and worse because of his support for abortion rights.
Stoking this rage, no doubt, is the dawning realization that the old religious right is crumbling — in part because Warren’s new generation of leaders departs from the Falwell-Robertson brand of zealots who have had a stranglehold on the G.O.P. It’s a sign of the old establishment’s panic that the Rev. Richard Cizik, known for his leadership in addressing global warming, was pushed out of his executive post at the National Association of Evangelicals this month. Cizik’s sin was to tell Terry Gross of NPR that he was starting to shift in favor of civil unions for gay couples.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/28/opinion/28rich.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

Agendas. Cizik has earned a spot on the victims Halle of Fame for sacrificing his love of pushing global-warming for the adoption of the gay union agenda (Rich is wrong, Cizik resigned, he wasn't pushed out).

Oh well, it's all old news. But it was new to me, what me being out here on the high seas and only got this message in a bottle.

Best wishes for the New Year, mates! Har-r-r-r-r!